Passive checks and check_period ...

[mohierf]

Hi,
it seems that Shinken ignores the check_period parameter for passive hosts and services checks ... is there any solution for that passively submitted checks are ignored for certain period of time ?

BR, Fred.

[naparuba]

Nop, passive is toally under taht sender responsability sorry

[mohierf]

I think that it should be interesting il Shinken was able to take care about check_period ... even if a new parameter is necessary. What do you think about it ?

[naparuba]

For passive? not sure that getting the responsability for cheduling is a good idea, after all, the last state is always better than the old one. If you don't want notification, look at first_notification_delay parameter